Archive for the ‘Of Interest to Family Court Litigants’ Category

Supreme Court finds harmless error in denial of counsel for termination of parental rights

The May 8, 2013 Supreme Court opinion in Broom v. Derrick affirmed a termination of parental rights (TPR) despite the appellant Mother having apparently completed the treatment plan from the removal action and being erroneously denied counsel at the beginning of the TPR proceedings. The Child at issue was initially removed from Mother’s care at [...]

Court of Appeals reverses termination of parental rights as not in child’s best interests

The May 3, 2013 Court of Appeals opinion in SCDSS v. Cameron N. F. L. (dig those initials) reversed the termination of parental rights (TPR) of a nine year old special needs child because it found such termination was not in the child’s best interests. Both the factual and evidentiary issues in this case were [...]

No lesson learned two years after the spanking

Two years after the United States Supreme Court reversed the South Carolina Supreme Court in Turner v. Rodgers, 131 S.Ct. 2507 (2011), I see no evidence that our family court system has taken any of Turner’s ruling to heart.  This is partially the fault of our state Supreme Court, which has failed to exercise its [...]

Hawkins affirms denial of child support reduction to downsized, underemployed father

The April 17, 2013 Court of Appeals opinion in Hawkins v. Hawkins demonstrates the continued reluctance of the family courts to reduce child support obligations for downsized non-custodial parents. In Hawkins, the parties’ divorce decree specifically allowed child support to be recalculated pursuant to the South Carolina Child Support Guidelines on an annual basis.  In [...]

Pre-trial order settling “personal property” precludes equitable distribution of retirement accounts

I’ve had a few cases in which the issue of what constitutes “personal property” has been the subject of debate.  The understanding of the typical litigant is that such property is the household furnishings–what a homeowner’s policy might consider “contents.”  However, from a purely legal standard, personal property is any property that isn’t real estate. [...]

Renegotiating with litigants who won’t obey their previous court-approved agreements

Folks who refuse to comply with their court-approved agreements but then ask you to renegotiate those agreements to make them more to their liking are akin to domestic abusers attempting to sweet talk their way back into the home.  Which makes the folks who agree to renegotiate agreements that the other side won’t obey…..abused. Just [...]

Mediator full employment act hits the tri-county area

News today from the South Carolina Judicial Department announced a March 14, 2013 Supreme Court order making Berkeley, Charleston and Dorchester Counties subject to mandatory alternative dispute resolution for “cases filed in the circuit court and the family court on or after June 1, 2013.”  Previously the local family courts were pretty uniform about requiring [...]

Divided Supreme Court reinstates termination of parental rights

In the March 20, 2013 opinion in SCDSS v. Sarah W., a divided South Carolina Supreme Court reinstated a termination of parental rights and rejected a challenge to the constitutionality of S.C. Code § 63-7-2570(8), which allows parental rights to be terminated when “[t]he child has been in foster care under the responsibility of the [...]