Posts Tagged ‘Contempt Enforcement Rule to Show Cause’

Unclean hands as a defense to contempt

In many of the rules to show cause I prosecute, the opposing party will raise the defense of “unclean hands,” arguing that my client’s failure to fully comply with the terms of the order precludes him or her from any equitably relief in enforcing that order.  In eighteen years of practice, I’ve seen the family [...]

In pro se appeal, Supreme Court offers guidance on forms of and sanctions for contempt

Members of the family court bar should thank pro se litigant Brian DiMarco for taking his appeal all the way to the South Carolina Supreme Court to fight a $250.00 fine.  The Supreme Court’s August 1, 2011 opinion in DiMarco v. DiMarco, 393 S.C. 604, 713 S.E.2d 631 (2011), provides excellent guidance on the distinction between criminal and civil [...]

United States Supreme Court finds that indigent defendant is not entitled to appointed counsel for child support civil contempt proceeding but still vacates South Carolina Supreme Court judgment of civil contempt

The June 20, 2011 United States Supreme Court opinion in Turner v. Rogers, 131 S.Ct. 2507 (2011), will radically alter the way the South Carolina Family Court handles child support (and alimony) enforcement.  It’s about time. Turner’s challenge before the United States Supreme Court regarded the South Carolina Supreme Court’s determination that he was not entitled to [...]

United States Supreme Court accepts certiorari on South Carolina child support enforcement case

Yesterday the United States Supreme Court accepted certiorari on the South Carolina case of Price v. Turner,  387 S.C. 142, 691 S.E.2d 470 (2010).  The question Mr. Turner asked the Supreme Court to address was “Whether the Supreme Court of South Carolina erred in holding – in conflict with twenty-two federal courts of appeals and [...]

Calling bullsh*t on custodial parents who let the children decide their visitation

When I first started practicing family law I would encounter a number of visitation enforcement hearings in which the custodial parent tried to excuse his or her failure to have the children visit with the other parent because “the children didn’t want to.”  Occasionally, and much to my frustration, the judges would sometime accept this [...]

The foolishness of agreeing to family court jurisdiction when issues are contested or subject to enforcement

In the first year of law school everyone takes Civil Procedure, where we learn about in rem jurisdiction, quasi in rem jurisdiction and in personam [personal] jurisdiction.  One percent of us understand the concepts clearly and other ninety-nine percent (including me) promptly misremember or forget most of what we learned–and then, possibly, relearn these lessons [...]

Applying Family Court Rule 27 to line jump the docket on visitation enforcement

I met with a father earlier this week for a consult.  He mentioned that he had gone five months without seeing his teenage daughter and his rule to show cause to enforce his visitation was scheduled for a pre-trial but hadn’t been set for hearing.  I found the matter distressing.  As I have previous blogged [...]

Supreme Court rejects claim that indigent is entitled to court appointed attorney to defend civil contempt

I would love to see our South Carolina Supreme Court explain how an indigent holds the key to his cell door by paying $6,000.00 he doesn’t have.  Today’s Supreme Court opinion in Price v. Turner, 387 S.C. 142, 691 S.E.2d 470 (2010), makes that claim but does nothing to substantiate it. I have previously noted two potential challenges to [...]