Posted Wednesday, March 9th, 2011 by Gregory Forman

My client, the wife, was caught in flagrant adultery.  Husband filed for divorce and filed a motion for temporary relief seeking custody of the children and to have my client ordered to vacate the marital home (and for alimony too).  In South Carolina this is the equivalent of the opposing party having a gun to your client’s head.

Now if the South Carolina family courts overemphasize adultery in their custody determinations, they really overemphasize marijuana use.  In some states occasional marijuana use is irrelevant to custody; in South Carolina it’s fatal.  When my client noted that her husband smoked pot, I had my strategy…

A demand for a hair test at my client’s expense–with the threat of an expedited hearing if the request was refused–resulted in a positive test from husband for marijuana use.  Suddenly his temporary relief request looked less like a slaughter and more like a….

Mexican standoff, a slang term defined as a stalemate or impasse; a confrontation that neither side can foreseeably win.  Husband’s motion was withdrawn.  The parties are trying counseling.  Another South Carolina marriage is, temporarily, preserved.

 

Filed under

(1) Comment

Linda

March 9, 2011 at 12:05 pm

I just had one similar, where my client was committing adultery and opposing counsel requested a temporary hearing to have her vacate the residence, and seeking custody. . .but I didn't have the "pot shield". . .still got custody and the house incidental thereto, as well as a monthly income as an advance against equitable apportionment (she was a housewife, has not worked in ten years, and obviously not entitled to alimony). . . I'm happy, but still shaking my head. . .unbelievable

Leave a Reply

One response to “Mexican standoff: South Carolina Family Court version”

  1. I just had one similar, where my client was committing adultery and opposing counsel requested a temporary hearing to have her vacate the residence, and seeking custody. . .but I didn’t have the “pot shield”. . .still got custody and the house incidental thereto, as well as a monthly income as an advance against equitable apportionment (she was a housewife, has not worked in ten years, and obviously not entitled to alimony). . . I’m happy, but still shaking my head. . .unbelievable

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Contact

Schedule a Consultation

If you are looking to schedule a consultation or retain Mr. Forman please fill out this form and he will get back to you promptly.

Mr. Forman currently charges $500.00 for initial consultations, which last one-hour. This consult fee is due at the time the consult is scheduled and is non-refundable. You are welcome to use this link to pay the consult fee and Mr. Forman will get back to you about scheduling the consult.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*
Address