Abate v. Abate, 377 S.C. 548, 660 S.E.2d 515 (Ct.App. 2008), is a published March 2008 opinion from the South Carolina Court of Appeals.  The primary issue on appeal was whether my client, Mr. Abate (the father of a child diagnosed with ADHD) was in contempt of court for failing to give his son ADHD medications during his summer 2005 visitation.  The Court of Appeals reversed the family court’s finding of contempt, finding his “acts demonstrate a good-faith effort to comply with the Decree’s requirement to follow Child’s ‘pediatrician’s and/or psychiatrist’s orders regarding medication.’”  The Court of Appeals additionally held that “Father’s temporary, physician-sanctioned drug holiday for Child indicates an effort to comply with the Decree by exploring ‘drug-free methods of raising child outside Child’s school year to avoid compromising Child’s performance in school.’”

In addition, the Court of Appeals found that there was an ambiguity in the parties’ agreement regarding summer day care costs, allowing Mr. Abate to go back to court to resolve whether he was entitled to credit for these expenses in future years.  The Court of Appeals also remanded the family court’s denial of Mr. Abate’s request for attorney’s fees from the lower court hearing back the family court.

Put Mr. Forman’s experience, knowledge, and dedication to your service for any of your South Carolina family law needs.

Recent Blog Posts

Court of Appeals holds results of a penile plethysmograph (PPG) test are inadmissible as unreliable

I typically don’t blog about criminal cases and In the Matter of Shawn T. Daily may still get altered by the Court of

[ + ] Read More

Drafting passport provisions for Child Custody Agreements

As foreign travel has gotten easier and my client base has gotten wealthier, more of my clients need their child custody agreements to

[ + ] Read More

Court of Appeals clarifies what domestic litigation is rendered moot by a child’s emancipation

The August 21, 2024 Court of Appeals opinion in Bristol v. Lipnevicius clarifies what portions of domestic litigation are rendered moot by a

[ + ] Read More