Deltoro v. McMullen, 322 S.C. 328, 471 S.E.2d 742 (Ct.App.1996), is a published May 1996 opinion from the South Carolina Court of Appeals.  It is the only published opinion from the South Carolina appellate courts which was an outright defeat for my client.

The case involved the right of the South Carolina family court to modify a Virginia child support order against a Virginia resident (Mr. McMullen).  After the family court modified his Virginia child support order, he retained me to handle his appeal.

On appeal, for the first time, Mr. McMullen raised the issue of the South Carolina family court’s lack subject matter jurisdiction to modify a Virginia child support order.  The appeal turned on whether to apply the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA) or the recently enacted Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA).  Modification of foreign support orders where the other party still lived in the using state was allowed under URESA; it was not allowed under UIFSA.  UIFSA was enacted after Ms. Deltoro filed her support modification case but before the case went to trial.

Initially, the Court of Appeals reversed the family court’s decision, holding that under UIFSA the family court did not have jurisdiction to modify Mr. McMullen’s child support obligation.  Ms. Deltoro’s attorney then sought rehearing, arguing (correctly) that, due to a savings clause, jurisdiction attached under URESA at the time of filing and remained throughout the case.

This appeal was part of the inspiration for my first published article on family law: Creating or Defeating South Carolina Jurisdiction in Multi-State Custody or Support Cases

Put Mr. Forman’s experience, knowledge, and dedication to your service for any of your South Carolina family law needs.

Recent Blog Posts

Court of Appeals rejects father’s numerous challenges to custody and support modification decision

The August 26, 2020 Court of Appeals case of Whitesell v. Whitesell finds the Appellant making numerous legal arguments, a few of them

[ + ] Read More

Court of Appeals reopens equitable distribution due to “fraud upon the court”

The August 26, 2020, Court of Appeals opinion in Sanders v. Smith presents an unusual resolution of a Rule 60 motion. Husband filed

[ + ] Read More

The explicable, but almost certainly unconstitutional, restraint on parents and spouses posting to social media

A few months ago, the New York Times posted a story, Divorcing Parents Have a Right to Post Their Stories Online, Court Says,

[ + ] Read More