Harrod v. Harrod is an October, 2022, unpublished Court of Appeals opinion, reversing the family court’s reduction of Wife’s alimony.

In Harrod, Husband filed an action in the family court seeking to reduce his alimony obligation.  Husband alleged three substantial changes of circumstances.  At trial, the family court reduced Wife’s alimony from $1,600 to $1,100 per month retroactive to the month of filing.  She hired me to appeal.

The Court of Appeals reversed the family court’s alimony reduction and remanded the matter back to the family court to consider an award of attorney’s fees to Wife. The Court of Appeals found that of the three changes of circumstances Husband alleged, none were both marital and an actual change.

The Court of Appeals found Wife’s move to Mexico “does not constitute an unanticipated substantial and material change in circumstance.” Wife had already been living in Mexico part-time at the time of the parties’ divorce and Husband never established how her living in Mexico was material to the alimony obligation.

The Court of Appeals also found Wife’s increased rental income was not a substantial change of circumstance. The initial alimony award anticipated Wife having rental income and that rental income had not increased substantially since the initial award.

Finally, Husband had asserted his income had decreased since alimony was initially awarded. The Court of Appeals noted that his income had actually increased.  Because Husband failed to establish that any of his alleged changes of circumstances were both factually accurate and material, the Court of Appeals reversed the family court’s alimony reduction and remanded the matter back to the family court to reconsider Wife’s requests for fees.

Put Mr. Forman’s experience, knowledge, and dedication to your service for any of your South Carolina family law needs.

Recent Blog Posts

May 9th Q&A with Professor Marcia Zug about You’ll Do at Blue Bicycle Books

On May 9, 2024 at 5:00 p.m. I will be doing a Q&A with Marcia Zug, the Miles and Ann Loadholt Professor of

[ + ] Read More

What Challengers gets right about modern marriage

Before I started law school, I was one of two film reviewers for what is now the Philadelphia Weekly. My wife’s and my

[ + ] Read More

Slightly modified Gandy opinion makes two small factual corrections

On March 20, 2024, the South Carolina Court of Appeals refiled its opinion in Gandy v. Gandy, making two minor factual adjustments. The

[ + ] Read More