Manigault v. Manigault is an unpublished April 2008 opinion from the South Carolina Court of Appeals.  In Manigault, I represented a husband who, prior to my representation, failed to show up for trial and was not happy with the result.  He retained me to petition the family court to reopen the case based on his confusion regarding the final hearing.  The family court agreed to reopen the case and his wife appealed.  The Court of Appeals affirmed the family court’s decision, finding that the family court judge did not abuse her discretion in reopening the case.

Put Mr. Forman’s experience, knowledge, and dedication to your service for any of your South Carolina family law needs.

Recent Blog Posts

Fornicating (even baby-making) does not turn jointly titled property into “marital property”

I’ve been getting a number of recent calls from people in long-term sexual relationships seeking assistance in dividing up their property.  Sometimes these

[ + ] Read More

The pitfalls of mandatory pre-litigation mediation provisions

I increasingly see provisions in custody or support agreements that require mandatory mediation before either party can file a mediation case. Sometimes these

[ + ] Read More

Lecture material for Why Family Court Attorneys should do Appeals

Below is my lecture for the May 6, 2022, Continuing Legal Education program Why Family Court Attorneys should do Appeals: To begin I’d

[ + ] Read More