Manigault v. Manigault is an unpublished April 2008 opinion from the South Carolina Court of Appeals. In Manigault, I represented a husband who, prior to my representation, failed to show up for trial and was not happy with the result. He retained me to petition the family court to reopen the case based on his confusion regarding the final hearing. The family court agreed to reopen the case and his wife appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed the family court’s decision, finding that the family court judge did not abuse her discretion in reopening the case.
Court of Appeals holds results of a penile plethysmograph (PPG) test are inadmissible as unreliable
I typically don’t blog about criminal cases and In the Matter of Shawn T. Daily may still get altered by the Court of
Drafting passport provisions for Child Custody Agreements
As foreign travel has gotten easier and my client base has gotten wealthier, more of my clients need their child custody agreements to
Court of Appeals clarifies what domestic litigation is rendered moot by a child’s emancipation
The August 21, 2024 Court of Appeals opinion in Bristol v. Lipnevicius clarifies what portions of domestic litigation are rendered moot by a
