Perry v. Olson is an unpublished May, 2023 opinion from the Court of Appeals.  On appeal, I represented the mother, Ms. Olson, who, at trial, had lost custody of her son. At the beginning of the appeal process, I had that custody order superseded, so she kept custody during the three years the appeal took to resolve. 

The Court of Appeals originally scheduled oral argument. When it later cancelled oral argument, I expected a reversal or a remand for a new trial. Instead it affirmed, disposing with my substantial argument on custody with a mere “The family court did not err in granting Father custody of Child without prohibiting contact between Child and Father’s brother.” When the Supreme Court refused to grant certiorari, the child was returned to father.

Olson remains one of the biggest disappointments of my career.

Put Mr. Forman’s experience, knowledge, and dedication to your service for any of your South Carolina family law needs.

Recent Blog Posts

The wrong times to be starting marital or custody litigation

One of my earliest blogs addressed the idea that the family court only has jurisdiction over a child’s custody for a period of

[ + ] Read More

Don’t ask your attorney to alter his or her preparation procedure

Every trial lawyer with even a few years of practice develops set procedures to prepare for hearings and trial. In my case there

[ + ] Read More

In South Carolina family court, is all social media usage discoverable?

In divorce or child custody cases, I personally don’t like issuing broad discovery requests for the opposing party’s social media usage.  Until a

[ + ] Read More