Perry v. Olson is an unpublished May, 2023 opinion from the Court of Appeals.  On appeal, I represented the mother, Ms. Olson, who, at trial, had lost custody of her son. At the beginning of the appeal process, I had that custody order superseded, so she kept custody during the three years the appeal took to resolve. 

The Court of Appeals originally scheduled oral argument. When it later cancelled oral argument, I expected a reversal or a remand for a new trial. Instead it affirmed, disposing with my substantial argument on custody with a mere “The family court did not err in granting Father custody of Child without prohibiting contact between Child and Father’s brother.” When the Supreme Court refused to grant certiorari, the child was returned to father.

Olson remains one of the biggest disappointments of my career.

Put Mr. Forman’s experience, knowledge, and dedication to your service for any of your South Carolina family law needs.

Recent Blog Posts

Court of Appeals holds magistrate courts have jurisdiction to hear spouses’ requests for restraining orders

On May 13, 2026, the South Carolina Court of Appeals, in the case of Major v. Major, held that the magistrate courts have

[ + ] Read More

South Carolina Supreme Court holds results of a penile plethysmograph (PPG) test are inadmissible as unreliable

In 2024, the South Carolina Court of Appeals, in the case of In the Matter of Shawn T. Daily, 443 S.C. 557, 905

[ + ] Read More

Should you fight?

A sizable portion of folks contacting my office seeking representation are seeking an attorney who is “a fighter.”  They will often use canine

[ + ] Read More