Ware v. Ware, 404 S.C. 1, 743 S.E.2d 817 (2013), is a Supreme Court opinion reversing the Court of Appeals decision in Ware v. Ware, 390 S.C. 493, 702 S.E.2d 390 (Ct. App. 2010).  It reverses a family court determination that an Alabama divorce decree did not have priority over a South Carolina divorce decree because Alabama did not have personal jurisdiction over the Wife.  Husband argued that Wife was bound by the Alabama court’s determination that it had jurisdiction over her because she had entered a limited appearance to challenge personal jurisdiction and under the application of the “full faith and credit” clause of the United States Constitution, as interpreted by Durfee v. Duke , 375 U.S. 106, 111, 84 S.Ct. 242, 245, 11 L.Ed.2d 186 (1963), she was bound by this determination.

The South Carolina Supreme Court agreed, finding that Wife’s limited appearance to challenge jurisdiction meant that she had fully and fairly litigated the issue of personal jurisdiction despite her subsequent withdrawal from the Alabama action prior to trial.  Thus she was bound by the Alabama court’s determination that it had personal jurisdiction over her and the Alabama order had priority over the South Carolina orders.  For further information, see: Well it seemed obvious to me

Put Mr. Forman’s experience, knowledge, and dedication to your service for any of your South Carolina family law needs.

Recent Blog Posts

Don’t forget the “why” questions

I’ve recently been preparing for a number of custody trials while also working on a number of appeals I’ve inherited from trial counsel. 

[ + ] Read More

Do you prefer pop quizzes or open book exams?

A sizable minority of my clients still prefer the telephone over email to get their questions answered.  I certainly understand the desire of

[ + ] Read More

In contested custody litigation, there’s no downside to kindness

One of the quickest, easiest, and most effective “fixes” I can counsel my clients to do in contested custody litigation is to be

[ + ] Read More