Wymer v. Hiott is an unpublished February 2023 opinion from the Court of Appeals.  I represented a custodial mother who sought to change her son’s last name to a hyphenated name that would include her last name.  The family court denied her request and ordered her to pay a portion of father’s attorney’s fees.

On appeal, we argued that the child sharing a last name with his custodial parent was in his best interests and that father did not articulate a good reason to oppose the name change. The Court of Appeals did not agree, holding “she failed to meet her burden of proving the name change was in Child’s best interest.”

Because the Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of the name change it affirmed the attorney fee award.

Put Mr. Forman’s experience, knowledge, and dedication to your service for any of your South Carolina family law needs.

Recent Blog Posts

Court of Appeals affirms Mother can be held in contempt for publishing book critical of Father

The March 5, 2025, Court of Appeals opinion in Clark v. Clark, 446 S.C. 909, 17 S.E.2d 917 (Ct. App. 2025), affirms the

[ + ] Read More

The wrong times to be starting marital or custody litigation

One of my earliest blogs addressed the idea that the family court only has jurisdiction over a child’s custody for a period of

[ + ] Read More

Don’t ask your attorney to alter his or her preparation procedure

Every trial lawyer with even a few years of practice develops set procedures to prepare for hearings and trial. In my case there

[ + ] Read More