Husband’s lack of credibility on financial disclosure has multiple adverse consequences

March 19, 2016

The March 16, 2016 Court of Appeals opinion in Conits v. Conits, 417 S.C. 127, 789 S.E.2d 51 (Ct. App. 2016) rejects many of Husband’s allegations of

Court of Appeals affirms custody, property division and fees

April 9, 2015

Can anyone explain the Court of Appeals’ thought process in what family law decisions it will publish? On April 8, 2015, mere weeks after deigning

How solo attorneys can work fewer hours, make more money, and have greater job satisfaction

February 6, 2015

When I talk to law students or young attorneys about law office management, I often show them the following formula as a method of getting

Court of Appeals continues recent trend of rejecting a family court’s credibility determinations

December 24, 2014

One portion of this opinion was substantially modified on February 25, 2015: Refiled opinion in Srivastava makes revisions to equitable distribution ruling. The December 23, 2014

Supreme Court sets procedures for family court attorney fee awards

December 3, 2014

The December 3, 2014 South Carolina Supreme Court opinion in Buist v. Buist, 410 S.C. 569, 766 S.E.2d 381 (2014), sets forth procedures to be used

Supreme Court completely reverses Court of Appeals and reinstates family court’s alimony, property division and attorney fee award

July 2, 2014

The July 2, 2014 Supreme Court opinion in Crossland v. Crossland, 408 S.C. 443, 759 S.E.2d 419 (2014), completely reverses the prior Court of Appeals opinion and

Court of Appeals rules prevailing party shouldn’t have to pay the other side’s attorney’s fees

June 9, 2014

The June 4, 2014 Court of Appeals opinion in Brown v. Brown, 408 S.C. 582, 758 S.E.2d 922 (Ct. App. 2014), reversed a $5,000 attorney fee award the

Court of Appeals finds prenuptial agreement only partially limited family court’s jurisdiction

March 26, 2014

The March 26, 2014 Court of Appeals opinion in Meehan v. Meehan, 407 S.C. 471, 756 S.E.2d 398 (Ct. App. 2014) determined that the Meehans’ prenuptial divested

Share

Subscribe

Archives