The authoritarian nature of anticipated substantial change of circumstances jurisprudence

February 18, 2012

No modern authoritarian government acts “lawlessly.”  Instead such governments cloak their actions with the veneer of due process but they manipulate the law so that

Overnight paramour restraints and homosexual relationships

February 18, 2012

A state that denies homosexuals the right to marry has no right to punish them for living together without being married. In 1967, the United

Should a parent’s adultery be per se relevant to child custody?

January 31, 2012

I’m no social conservative but, contrary to many South Carolina family law attorneys and judges, I believe that a parent’s adultery is almost automatically relevant

In disputes between biological parents and third-parties, we don’t want decisions to be based on “the best interests of the child”

January 30, 2012

A review of the excellent news reporting from Allyson Bird at the Charleston Post and Courier, regarding the adoption case involving two year-old, Veronica, her

WTF does the restraint against exposing minor children to “age inappropriate entertainment” actually mean?

January 20, 2012

I sometimes think there is some hidden law titled, “The South Carolina Family Law Attorney Full Employment Act,” which requires family court judges to issue

2011 provides further evidence of the dearth of published South Carolina family law appellate opinions

January 7, 2012

Two of my frequent complaints are that South Carolina family law attorneys don’t appeal enough of the decisions they believe are unjust and that the

Roof demonstrates confused nature of South Carolina’s “substantial change of circumstances” jurisprudence

December 23, 2011

In South Carolina, child support, child custody and permanent periodic alimony can all be modified upon a showing of “substantial change of circumstances.”  However, there

Unpublished opinion (doesn’t) make(s) new law on application of Schedule C guidelines

November 16, 2011

Floyd v. Morgan, 383 S.C. 469 , 681 S.E.2d 570 (2009) is possibly the worst published family law opinion to come out of the Supreme

Share

Subscribe

Archives