In South Carolina, name change requests are handled by the family court.  South Carolina law makes the process of changing a child’s name more complicated than most parents expect it to be.  Even if the parents agree on the name change, the court must still appoint a guardian ad litem to represent the child.  S.C. Code § 15-49-10(B).  Unless waived by the court, the parent seeking the name change must name the other parent as a party to the petition to change the child’s name. Id. “The court shall grant the petition if it finds that it is in the best interest of the child.”  Id.

If both parents agree and the guardian does not find the name change to be against the child’s best interests, the name change petition is almost always granted.  When the parents disagree on whether the name change is in the minor child’s best interest, the court applies the nine part test set forth in Mazzone v. Miles, 341 S.C. 203, 532 S.E.2d 890 (Ct.App.2000):

(1) the length of time that the child has used the present surname;  (2) the effect of the change on the preservation and development of the child’s relationship with each parent;  (3) the identification of the child as part of a family unit;  (4) the wishes of the parents;  (5) the stated reason for the proposed change;  (6) the motive of the parents and the possibility that the use of a different name will cause insecurity or a lack of identity;  (7) the difficulty, harassment, or embarrassment that the child may experience when the child bears a surname different from the custodial parent;  (8) the preference of the child if the child is of an age and maturity to express a meaningful preference;  and (9) the degree of community respect associated with the present and proposed surname.

Put Mr. Forman’s experience, knowledge, and dedication to your service for any of your South Carolina family law needs.

Recent Blog Posts

Before she was the Notorious RBG

I try to keep my politics out of my legal blog and, in the week since United States Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader

[ + ] Read More

Court of Appeals rejects father’s numerous challenges to custody and support modification decision

The August 26, 2020 Court of Appeals case of Whitesell v. Whitesell finds the Appellant making numerous legal arguments, a few of them

[ + ] Read More

Court of Appeals reopens equitable distribution due to “fraud upon the court”

The August 26, 2020, Court of Appeals opinion in Sanders v. Smith presents an unusual resolution of a Rule 60 motion. Husband filed

[ + ] Read More