Res judicata is a legal doctrine that once a fact has been conclusively legally established between two parties, those parties cannot challenge that prior legal finding.  It is a doctrine of judicial convenience. “Res judicata precludes parties from subsequently relitigating issues actually litigated and those that might have been litigated in a prior action.”  Duckett v. Goforth, 374 S.C. 446, 464, 649 S.E.2d 72, 81 (Ct. App. 2007). “A party seeking to preclude litigation on the grounds of res judicata must show: (1) identity of the parties; (2) identity of the subject matter; and (3) adjudication of the issue on the merits in the former suit by a court of competent jurisdiction.” Id, 374 S.C. at 465, 649 S.E.2d at 82. One often hears the aphorism “one bite at the apple.”  Res judicata prevents that second bite.

Res judicata has many applications in family court.  While issues related to children or permanent periodic alimony can be modified, the factual findings in prior final orders cannot be challenged in a subsequent case.  Findings in contempt orders and non-emergency protection from domestic abuse orders are also binding.  In contrast, any findings/rulings in family court temporary orders are not only not binding, they cannot be used to either party’s prejudice. Rimer v. Rimer, 361 S.C. 521, 527 n.6, 605 S.E.2d 572, 575 n.6 (Ct. App. 2004) (“Temporary hearings are not de facto final hearings, and we adhere to the principle that temporary orders must be without prejudice to the rights of the parties at the final hearing.”) (Emphasis in original).

One cannot litigate factual or legal issues that have previously been conclusively determined between the same parties.  That which can be modified can only be modified based on a showing of a subsequent substantial change of circumstances.   Once conclusively determined with finality, that which cannot be modified cannot be changed even if the factual basis for the ruling is incorrect.  Failure to get the correct result the first time can create a permanent and unfixable injustice.

Put Mr. Forman’s experience, knowledge, and dedication to your service for any of your South Carolina family law needs.

Recent Blog Posts

Slightly modified Gandy opinion makes two small factual corrections

On March 20, 2024, the South Carolina Court of Appeals refiled its opinion in Gandy v. Gandy, making two minor factual adjustments. The

[ + ] Read More

Feature in International Business Times on Navigating Marital Challenges

A recent blog I wrote on consulting an individual counselor before consulting a divorce lawyer generated interest in the International Business Times, resulting

[ + ] Read More

Consider seeking judicial notice of what occurs in court

If more family law attorneys handled appeals they would likely consider using judicial notice during their trials.  Judicial notice can be used to

[ + ] Read More