Has anyone else noticed that our South Carolina appellate courts have made a hash out of the burden of proof necessary to obtain a divorce on the grounds of adultery?
Three reported South Carolina cases state adultery must be proven by “clear and convincing evidence.” Doe v. Doe, 324 S.C. 492, 478 S.E.2d 854, 856 (Ct.App. 1996) (lower court properly denied divorce “finding Wife failed to prove adultery by clear and convincing evidence”); Anders v. Anders, 285 S.C. 512, 331 S.E.2d 340, 342 (1985) “evidence utterly fails to meet the requisite clear and convincing standard to prove adultery by circumstantial evidence”); Wilson v. Wilson, 285 S.C. 481, 330 S.E.2d 303, 304-05 (1985) (“evidence falls far short of meeting the clear and convincing standard to prove adultery”).
Perhaps, however, the standard is mere preponderance of the evidence. Perry v. Perry, 301 S.C. 147, 390 S.E.2d 480, 481 (Ct.App. 1990) (rejecting wife’s claim that her “adultery is not supported by the preponderance of the evidence”); Smith v. Smith, 262 S.C. 291, 204 S.E.2d 53, 55 (1974) (“It is our conclusion, after reviewing the evidence in this case, that the wife has failed to establish by the preponderance of the evidence that her husband was guilty of adultery.”
Then there are the twenty-seven reported cases citing a hybrid burden of proof that I have never encountered elsewhere: “clear preponderance of the evidence.” To cite a few, Gorecki v. Gorecki, 387 S.C. 626, 693 S.E.2d 419, 422 (Ct.App. 2010) (“proof of adultery must be clear and positive and the infidelity must be established by a clear preponderance of the evidence”); Brown v. Brown, 379 S.C. 271, 665 S.E.2d 174, 178 (Ct.App. 2008) (“Proof of adultery as a ground for divorce must be clear and positive and the infidelity must be established by a clear preponderance of the evidence”); McLaurin v. McLaurin, 294 S.C. 132, 363 S.E.2d 110, 111 (Ct.App. 1987) (“To obtain a divorce on the ground of adultery in South Carolina, the proof of the alleged adultery must be clear and positive, and the infidelity must be established by a clear preponderance of the evidence”); Miller v. Miller, 280 S.C. 314, 313 S.E.2d 288, 290 (1984) (“Adultery must be proved by a clear preponderance of the evidence”).
How can South Carolina have three different burdens of proof to prove adultery? Is there a different burden of proof to prove adultery to obtain a divorce versus proving adultery to deny alimony? The distinction between “mere preponderance of the evidence” and “clear and convincing evidence” is confusing enough. What the heck is “clear preponderance of the evidence?”
(29) Comments
Ryan Phillips
December 9, 2010 at 12:59 pm
Gregory Forman
December 9, 2010 at 1:19 pm
Thomas F. McDow
December 10, 2010 at 2:43 pm
Kathy Givens
December 13, 2010 at 9:25 pm
Gregory Forman
December 14, 2010 at 6:51 am
D. Mays Dickey
December 22, 2010 at 8:58 am
Jo Allen
August 24, 2011 at 2:13 pm
Kay
October 26, 2011 at 10:05 am
Chuck Hice
March 15, 2012 at 8:54 am
Gregory Forman
March 15, 2012 at 8:57 am
Sonya Turner
March 15, 2012 at 1:41 pm
Deborah
December 22, 2012 at 9:42 am
Crazy Mark Sanford wins congressional seat; in related news, meth is still a problem in South Carolina | FreakOutNation
May 7, 2013 at 7:54 pm
Tammy Helligas
September 1, 2013 at 10:40 am
Tammy Helligas
September 1, 2013 at 11:11 am
justin collard
October 21, 2013 at 8:30 am
Brian Attenborough
November 3, 2013 at 7:02 pm
Mike
March 7, 2014 at 11:53 pm
Cheryl
September 2, 2014 at 2:15 pm
Sadie Watkins
April 18, 2015 at 10:45 pm
Is It Adultery If The Divorce Has Been Filed | whuthxt.net
July 5, 2015 at 10:19 am
Adultery Divorce Nj Proof | Quick British Columbia Divorce Online
September 19, 2015 at 7:07 pm
Katherine
February 17, 2016 at 4:36 pm
Susie
June 3, 2016 at 2:17 pm
Matt
August 24, 2016 at 11:49 pm
Roger
October 27, 2016 at 9:48 am
Megan
January 7, 2017 at 11:51 am
Gregory Forman
January 7, 2017 at 12:47 pm
Janet byrd
February 1, 2017 at 8:56 pm