Posted Tuesday, May 19th, 2020 by Gregory Forman

A request for entry upon land for the purpose of inspection is a discovery option infrequently used by family court attorneys. Part of the reason for this is we often informally allow such inspections. There’s a good reason to require more formality.

Rule 34(a), SCRCP, allows a party to request an inspection “to permit entry upon designated land or other property in the possession or control of the party upon whom the request is served for the purpose of inspection and measuring, surveying, photographing, testing, or sampling the property or any designated object or operation thereon…” In many marital dissolution cases involving equitable distribution, a party might seek inspection of the other party’s residence to inventory and document the marital household items contained therein. Typically, these inspections are done informally–without the necessity of a request for inspection. However, the best practice is to require a formal request for inspection.

I began requiring such formal requests after a few cases in which an opposing counsel sought additional inspections of my client’s residences. While I fought these requests, my belief is that if I demanded, and obtained, a formal request when the initial inspection was sought, I would have a firmer basis to deny the subsequent request. Rule 26(a), SCRCP, authorizes the court to limit discovery when “the discovery sought is unreasonably cumulative or duplicative” or when “the party seeking discovery has had ample opportunity by discovery in the action to obtain the information sought.” Further, demanding a formal request for inspection impresses upon the opposing party the need to do a full and complete inspection the first time–and not to cause trouble during the inspection. The number of times the opposing party has gotten argumentative with my client in the midst of an inspection drastically decreased once I began demanding formal requests for inspection.

While a party certainly has the right to inspect the opposing party’s residence to inventory marital property, that right is limited and does not provide the party unfettered access to an estranged spouse’s residence. Demanding formal requests for inspection insures better behavior and more thoughtful inspections.

Filed under

(0) Comments

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Contact

Schedule a Consultation

If you are looking to schedule a consultation or retain Mr. Forman please fill out this form and he will get back to you promptly.

Mr. Forman currently charges $500.00 for initial consultations, which last one-hour. This consult fee is due at the time the consult is scheduled and is non-refundable. You are welcome to use this link to pay the consult fee and Mr. Forman will get back to you about scheduling the consult.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*
Address