It’s called vigilantism

Posted Friday, November 27th, 2015 by Gregory Forman
Filed under Jurisprudence, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Visitation

Of all of my blogs the one that has generated the most comments is Calling bullsh*t on custodial parents who let the children decide their

The risk of sending South Carolina family law clients to counseling

Posted Wednesday, September 9th, 2015 by Gregory Forman
Filed under Attorney-Client Relations, Jurisprudence, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific

Many family law clients in the initial stage of custody or divorce litigation could benefit from counseling. Whether it is developing better coping methods for

Why family law in South Carolina is so underdeveloped

Posted Friday, July 3rd, 2015 by Gregory Forman
Filed under Jurisprudence, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific

South Carolina family law attorneys frequently complain about the random nature of family court. A large part of the reason for this “randomness” is that

What ever happened to comity?

Posted Thursday, April 16th, 2015 by Gregory Forman
Filed under Audience:, Jurisprudence, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific

I am beginning to pity the South Carolina Court of Appeals. For the third time in less than two months the South Carolina Supreme Court

How do you depublish an opinion?

Posted Saturday, March 28th, 2015 by Gregory Forman
Filed under Jurisprudence, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific

Twice in the past 1 ½ months the South Carolina Supreme Court has ordered that a published South Carolina Court of Appeals opinion be depublished.

In praise of modest decision making in family court

Posted Sunday, February 1st, 2015 by Gregory Forman
Filed under Jurisprudence, Law and Culture, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys

With a new family court judge for Charleston County due to be elected this week, the issue of the candidates’ attributes, and the bigger question

How should the family court handle misbehaving stepparents in custody litigation?

Posted Tuesday, August 12th, 2014 by Gregory Forman
Filed under Child Custody, Jurisprudence, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys

I have a fundamental jurisprudential difference with most of my family law colleagues and many of the state family court judges regarding how one should

Unpublished Court of Appeals opinion undefinitively answers one of my family court questions

Posted Wednesday, June 25th, 2014 by Gregory Forman
Filed under Contempt/Enforcement of Orders, Jurisprudence, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific

The June 25, 2014 unpublished Court of Appeals opinion in Katzburg v. Katzburg undefinitively answers one of my long-standing family court questions. I was retained

When should the family court award grandparent visitation?

Posted Tuesday, June 17th, 2014 by Gregory Forman
Filed under Jurisprudence, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Of Interest to General Public, Visitation

There’s some dispute surrounding last week’s blog regarding the wholesale revision of South Carolina’s grandparent visitation statute. Some commenters contend that grandparents should never be awarded autonomous

Should there be a uniform waiting period for a no-fault divorce?

Posted Saturday, March 8th, 2014 by Gregory Forman
Filed under Divorce and Marriage, Jurisprudence, Legislation, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to General Public

I rarely blog on proposed family law legislation.  Often legislation fizzles to nothing: in my twenty years of practice bills to abolish common law marriage

Put Mr. Forman’s experience, knowledge, and dedication to your service for any of your South Carolina family law needs.