South Carolina Specific

July 29th, 2010

Being the primary caretaker, not discussing litigation with the child, and not harassing the other parent continue to be prevailing factors in custody case

The July 28, 2010 Court of Appeals opinion in High v. High, 389 S.C. 226, 697 S.E.2d 690 (Ct. App. 2010) presents little new analysis of custody law.  Mother was awarded custody by the family court and this was affirmed by the Court of Appeals, primarily because it appeared that mother was the primary caretaker of […]

Of Interest to Family Court Litigants

July 28th, 2010

In era of DNA paternity testing, Supreme Court finally (and greatly) weakens presumption of in-wedlock paternity

“The presumption that a child born in wedlock is legitimate, although rebuttable, is one of the strongest known in the law.” Lewter by Epps v. Thompson, 281 S.C. 397, 315 S.E.2d 821, 823 (Ct.App. 1984).  Yet, for as long as I have been practicing family law, I’ve expected the Supreme Court to eventually reduce or eliminate […]

Not South Carolina Specific

July 22nd, 2010

When the buck stops nowhere, failure is to be expected: the problems created by the lack of tort liability for a Social Service agency’s failure to protect a child from abusive caregivers

My first year of law school the United States Supreme Court, in the case of Deshaney v. Winnebago Cty. Soc. Servs. Dept., 489 U.S. 189 (1989), rejected a claim that negligence of a child protective service agency to protect a child from an abusive caregiver was a violation of the due process clause of the […]

Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys

July 21st, 2010

Court of Appeals affirms biased eyewitness testimony insufficient to prove adultery

The July 24, 2010 Court of Appeals opinion in Kennedy v. Kennedy, 389 S.C. 494, 699 S.E.2d 184 (Ct. App. 2010) provides some guidance on proof of adultery, alimony, and apportionment of marital debt. The family court refused to find that Wife committed adultery and the Court of Appeals affirmed.  Husband’s evidence of adultery was solely based on […]

Of Interest to Family Court Litigants

July 15th, 2010

South Carolina’s bass-ackwards approach to life insurance to secure support payments

South Carolina’s approach to the requirement of life insurance to secure child support or alimony payments could only have been designed by someone with no appreciation for economics.  Through its structure of perverse incentives, we have created a system that generates unneeded controversy, misallocates the cost of this insurance, and practically guarantees an inefficient level […]

Contact

Schedule a Consultation

If you are looking to schedule a consultation or retain Mr. Forman please fill out this form and he will get back to you promptly.

Mr. Forman currently charges $500.00 for initial consultations, which last one-hour. This consult fee is due at the time the consult is scheduled and is non-refundable. You are welcome to use this link to pay the consult fee and Mr. Forman will get back to you about scheduling the consult.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*
Address